Case History Section 30

Section 30 speaks of Harmon and Carolyn's arrival in New Zealand in August, 2001 and their continued efforts to cooperate with the family court authorities in Colorado to the benefit of his children.  After some introductions to local business and political leaders and having completed an assessment of the investment opportunities in New Zealand, they decided to settle for a while in Christchurch, New Zealand.   In considering the legal and financial hardships they had endured while in Canada through the attacks from Colorado and the US Justice System, certain financial precautions were taken by Carolyn with regard to her family estate.  Harmon was required to sign a prenuptial agreement concurrent with their marriage and Carolyn then employed Harmon to manage her estate and investments in New Zealand and elsewhere.  This employment has been Harmon's sole personal income to date.  Harmon's compensation has been directly equivalent to his payments of child support and maintenance plus basic personal expenses based upon a US $50,000 annual salary. To date, Carolyn has made a number of investments, all of which are vested in Carolyn's family trust.  Neither Carolyn nor Harmon own any of these investments personally and Harmon is confined strictly to his income equivalent child support and basic living expenses. 

In early 2002, Harmon and Carolyn retained NZ attorney, John Rutherford to make contact with the Colorado representatives of both family court cases to begin re-negotiating payment structures and attempt mediation and resolution as was possible. The attached PDF E-mail record shows a sampling of the regular communication with Dearna's attorney, Jeffrey Herren and Sandra's representative at the Arapahoe County DA's office, child support services, Jenny Rutherford (no relation).  As indicated in the e-mails, nothing was accomplished in mediation of the old structures of payment, however it was agreed as to what Harmon's new salary could justify for child support and as such certain minimum levels of new payments were established.  In order to get the new payment structure started on a good foundation, Carolyn agreed to loan Harmon US$50,000 as a good faith payment to divide equally between Dearna and Sandra and then begin to make quarterly payments thereafter from his salary at rates above the minimum requirements.  Attached is a PDF schedule of the payments made since April, 2002 to date totaling over US $200,000 The amount currently being paid quarterly is US$10,500 or $42,000 per year.  The original collective amount ordered by the courts in both cases is an unrealistic, unjustified and outrageous at US$10,500 PER MONTH.  The child support authorities in both counties have offered to reconsider the original judgments based upon a true record of past and current income.  After over four years of consistent payments in late 2005, Harmon bagan submissions to the respective counties to accomplish this goal.  This reconsideration is of course only for the current and further payment levels.  The only way given to deal with the accumulated arrearage is to return to Colorado and challenge the original judgments in court.  Having returned two times previous to work with the system on all family issues only to have the courts and the law enforcement systems violate his rights even to the extent of knowingly and deliberately breaching the International Hague Commission Treaty with further illegal charges and arrest warrants, makes this a non option.

After some considerable cooperation through correspondence, including e-mails, letters and notarized documents between Harmon's NZ attorney, Al Manco, and the Child Support Enforcement Authority in Colorado, an agreement and stipulation was reached as attached hereto in PDF, Approved Child Support Reduction.  The amazing conclusion was to reduce what was thousands of dollars per month in support requirements, to a mere $50 per month because of what the Colorado Support Authority stated as a "refusal to cooperate" on the part of Harmon's ex-wife.  When Harmon's attorney returned the signed and notarized stipulation for approval by the court, he was shocked to receive a return letter from the Authority on October 31, 2005 stating their unwillingness to approve the stipulation with the court or cooperate further... "based upon the financial information you provided, and your US citizenship being renounced...", please see attached PDF Child Services Notice.  After numerous attempts to phone the Authority for an explanation during which they refused to take his calls, and e-mails with no response, Mr. Manco wrote the attached PDF letter dated 14 November, 2005, Reply to Case Manager Meghann Pence, outlining the lengthy process and approvals to date (including their stipulated approval of Harmon's financial information) and demanding an explanation. After forwarding this letter by mail, e-mail and fax, to date there has been no reply or futher cooperation from the Colorado Child Support Enforcement Authority.

In the process of Harmon's submission to the American Embassy in New Zealand in 2004 to either renew or add pages to his passport that had no room for further stamps (expired in December, 2005), the Embassy was instructed to retain his passport until he payed all back accumulated child support and spousal maintenance of over  USD $1,000,000 (One Million  US Dollars).  He is now making submissions to show the original amounts of the judgments in both cases influenced by the political corruption described throughout this web site as outrageous and unfair.  Of course he does not have now, nor never has had 1 million US dollars.  If he is forced to return to the US to challenge these judgments, he will most certainly face recriminations from the CIA and/or at the very least, be re-incarcerated by the El Paso County DA, Jeanne Smith, stopping his gainful employment and child support payments.  At the same time, this latest action deliberately interferes with Harmon's submission for a NZ Business Visa leading on to residency so he can continue his employment.  Catch 22?  Lose no matter what, for himself and his children? The US has given Harmon no other reasonable choice but to file an appeal to remain in New Zealand upon the expiration of his Visa in 2004 with the documentation within this web site as his justified evidence.  Imagine an American asking for sanctuary just short of political asylum from in-humane treatment and criminal political corruption in the US. 

As shown in this web site, Harmon has gone to great lengths to report the political corruption behind his family court judgments and related criminal charges, and cooperate with the US system to prove his innocence to no avail.  He has gone all the way to the top to find no possibility of a level playing field to hear his case.  Therefore he has come to the conclusion that the only level playing field left is the World Wide Web Court of Public Justice.  This is the field of legal battle that he has now chosen, hoping that this challenge against those who have attacked him can be justly played out before the media as his judge and the World Wide Web / global public as his jury. 

Lumina Diem and the World Wide Web Court of Public Justice is now in session and we call upon all of those named in the Summons and Complaints contained herein to step up and face Harmon on this level playing field.  May the truth prevail and the best man win!  In Harmon's own words, "My life is an open book and I have nothing to hide.  I have lived this nightmare for over 14 years and it's time to finally insure my children's well being, get the truth on the table, and get all of those individuals responsible for this criminal injustice fired and in some cases, prosecuted! In the mean time Carolyn and I are seeking residency and citizenship in New Zealand or elsewhere if turned away".

Index of PDF Documents in Case History Section 30:

Pg       1-14    E-mail record of support efforts from New Zealand

Pg       1          Child Support record, April 2001 through September 2004

Pg       1          Child Support Services Notice of discontinuance of copperation

Pg       1-2       Reply to Colorado Child Support Services Case Manager Meghann Pence

Questions:

1. With Harmon's whereabouts in New Zealand known by the US authorities from the time of his initial arrival in late 2001, and assuming the custody related criminal charges were not dismissed or sealed with the federal sealing of the record of the Hague Commission violation, why would he have not been pursued by the US authorities as in Canada through extradition, if there were truly any substance to these accusations?
2. Is it possible that the US knows that New Zealand would never partner up with their corruption, unlike Canada?
3. As a part of the filing of appeal to remain in New Zealand, and with Harmon having no passport at this time to support the New Zealand based international businesses, Harmon is also requesting residency and citizenship in New Zealand.  If New Zealand will not grant ultimate residency and citizenship, are there other countries globally who will accept Harmon and Carolyn as citizens personally along with the placement of Carolyn's global based businesses and investments?  Please see www.harmonwilfred.com for their personal and business profiles.
4. When Harmon's ex-wives refused to cooperate on a financial update to determine child support, what purpose did it serve to simply penalize them by reducing the amount to $50 per month? Did they refuse because they were cheating on the system?  Is this in the best interest of the children?
5. When Harmon was unable to show up for an ordered  financial examination to determine child support, an arrest order was issued to force a Rule 69 Financial Examination under Court supervision.  Are the rules different for ex-wives?
6. Why did the Colorado Child Support Enforcement Authority complete an exhaustive process of obtaining all of Harmon's financial information, offer him a stipulated settlement, and then refuse to cooperate further? Is this in the best interest of the children?