Section 33, UN Human Rights

Apr 12 - Jan 07, 2009

Wilfred Sues Canada For Human Rights Violations; US deems UN Not Competent

Section 33 is an expose’ of Harmon's unprecedented United Nations Petition and Complaint initially presented on 12 April, 2007 to the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in Geneva, Switzerland against the USA and Colorado. A revised Petition and Complaint was presented on 12 June, 2007 renaming the defendants as Canada and the USA and including the State of Colorado. The first revised Complaint alleges and outlines over a decade of human rights abuses under the Optional Protocol to the ICCPR, the Convention Against Torture and other Cruel, Inhumane or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT) and the Convention on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR). The second and final revised Complaint solely against Canada has provided for the required removal of the US and Colorado as offending states as per the UN Petitions Unit instructions as follows: "... the United States of America has not accepted the competence of the Human Rights Committee or that of the Committee against torture to examine individual complaints, therefore you are invisted to adjust your complaint accordingly" (see E-mail Transcript, Petitions Unit). Harmon's legal counsel representing the case is International Attorney and Human Rights Advocate, Major Guneet Chaudhary; Advocate Supreme Court of India, and Member of the International Bar Association, London, England.

Harmon alleges in this Complaint to have endured death threats by the CIA, inhumane, torturous and degrading incarceration for 120 days in a maximum security underground Canadian prison by order of the Canadian Justice Department in cooperation with the US Government, 21 days in a US Federal prison in Colorado, and four days in the Denver city jail by order of US Federal Marshals without charges or bail. All of these offences involved either the direct or indirect participation of Canada, and or without the objections of Canada under the US Canadian Extradition Treaty, Rule of Specialty. The final Petition brought before the UN Human Rights Council on 7 November, 2007 calls for international condemnation of the Canada and prays for the minimum restitution of 20 million Canadian dollars, and the restoration of his and his children's inalienable rights to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness". Harmon says he has finally had enough of living as a "persona non grata" in the shadow of what he alleges as flagrant violations of his human rights as outlined in his Petition and Complaint as defined by the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) as follows:

Article 6:    Clause 5, Right to Life...
Article 7:    Torture or Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
Article 9:    Clause 1, Right to Liberty and Security...
Article 9:    Clause 5, Unlawful Arrest... Compensation...
Article 10: Clause 1, ...Persons Deprived of Liberty... Treated with Respect and Dignity
Article 12: Right to Residence... Right to Leave and Return...
Article 13: Not Barred From One's Country Without Due Process Under Law...
Article 14: Equal Justice... Presumption of Innocence...
Article 15: Guilty of a Criminal Offence Only As Defined Under The Law
Article 16: Deprivation of Personhood...
Article 17: Attacks Upon Privacy, Honour and Reputation...
Article 26: Equal Protection before the Law...

The following are a list of actions taken by Harmon Wilfred from 1990 through 2005 to obtain redress from the United States for the alleged violations of his Human Rights. This list is but a fraction of Harmon's continuous and unabated attempts at redress; however, these efforts are either of official public record or can easily be verified:

Exhaustion of Official Domestic Remedies:

1990, 25 October ---------------	US District Court Case #90182: Wilfred v 18th Judicial District, Colorado for Violation of Civil Rights. See Case History Section 3, and Transcript Sections 1-16.
1992, 16 October -----------------	US District Court Case #92 CV 2042: Wilfred v RTC et al, Class Action for agency fraud and embezzlement. See Case History Section 4.
1994-1996 --------------------------	Reports of El Paso County Pension Fund Embezzlement to the Pension Fund, District Attorney, State Attorney General, and the FBI. These written reports have been utilized as evidence in all reports and cases of rights violations subsequent. See Case History, Section 6
1998 thru 1999 --------------------	National Correspondence Campaign: To Colorado State and Federal government officials and agencies, including Senate and Congress. See Case History Section 10 and Section 16
1999, 18 March -------------------	Courier Evidence Package to US Special Prosecutor, Kenneth Starr: See Case History Section 17
1999, 16 April ----------------------	Letter and Evidence Forwarded to the US Office of Congressional Affairs, and the Canadian Securities Intelligence Service. See Case History Section 18
1999, 13 November --------------	Official Meeting with President Bill Clinton's attorney, Gregory Craig, of the DC firm of Williams and Connolly. See Case History Section 6 and Section 20
2000, 31 March -------------------	Abandonment of Canadian Extradition Appeal to Return to Colorado and Resolve All Issues. See Case History, Section 22
2000, 11 May -----------------------	US District Court Case #00M1147. Challenged Criminal Case for Violation of International Treaty Rights. 26 May, 2000, Case Dismissed. See Case History Section 24
2000, 26 June ---------------------	Challenged Colorado 18th Judicial District Court for Violation of International Treaty Rights. 14 July, 2000, All Matters Dismissed. Case History Section 26
2000, 26 June ---------------------	Official Letter of Diplomatic Complaint from Canadian Attorney, Alan Gold to the Canadian Justice Department for US Multiple Violations of the Hague Commission Extradition Treaty. Case History Section 25
2000, 04 October -----------------	Official Report and Comprehensive Evidence Package to the US Justice Department. 10 May, 2001, Response from USJD.... " A criminal investigation by the USJOD is not warranted. We regret that we can be of no further assistance." See Case History Section 29
2001, 19 January -----------------	Case #97 DR 3393. Request to the Colorado Court by Wilfred for the Assignment of a Special Advocate for the Welfare and Safety of his Children. See Case History Section 29
2002 thru 2005 --------------------	Harmon Wilfred continued his correspondence with the Child Support and Social Services in Colorado on behalf of his three children from his arrival in New Zealand in August, 2001 in order to foster full cooperation and resolve all issues in the best interest of the continuing safety and welfare of his children. Unfortunately, the authorities have terminated their cooperation as of 19 October, 2005. See Lumina Diem, Case History Section 30

It is not possible for Harmon to return to the Canada or the US to seek further remedies. He strongly believes that because he has blown the whistle with documented and credible evidence and result against the Canadian Government as well as US state and federal high level political figures, government and judicial agencies, and especially the US Central Intelligence Agency and the Canadian Securities Intelligence Service, over judicial and political corruption; including the embezzlement of billions of dollars of public funds, with many of the perpetrators still at large, and some in high level positions of political authority; Harmon is justifiably and genuinely apprehensive for his freedom and personal safety should he ever return, or be returned to Canada or the United States.

The final Revised Compalint solely against Canada as well as the previous Petitions with all Exhibits may be accessed by clicking on the individual PDF links vertically listed in the left margin of this page, or by clicking the following PDF links and accessing the Exhibit Links within the contents of the document. The final Petition against Canada is accompanied by an Open Letter from Harmon to the UN OHCHR Petitions Unit, outlining the final required adjustments submitted and providing further explanation as to the specific changes and/or additions. The referenced Exhibits are identical in all of the revised and original complaints:

Wilfred v Canada, UN OHCHR Petition and Complaint
Adobe Acrobat Document: 516 KB, 76 seconds @ 56kbps
Revised and presented to the UN Human Rights Counsel on 7 Novemebr, 2007

OPEN LETTER to UN TB Petitions Unit
Adobe Acrobat Document: 28.5 KB, 4 seconds @ 56kbps
Open Letter from Harmon Wilfred to the UN OHCHR Petitions Unit dated 14 Nov, 2007 re adjustments to Final Petition against Canada

E-mail Transcript, UN Petitions Unit
Adobe Acrobat Document: 19.5 KB, 3 seconds @ 56kbps
UN Petitions Unit e-mails from 20 Sept to 18 Oct, 2007

UN HRC Petition Acceptance, 5 Dec, 2007
Adobe Acrobat Document: 104 KB, 15 seconds @ 56kbps
Assignment of Communication / Case No. 1638/2007

Oct3009, UNHRC Case No 1638/2007, Interim Decision
Adobe Acrobat Document: 1.64 MB, 4.1 minutes @ 56kbps

Jan0609, UNHRC, Case No 1638/2007, Review Request
Adobe Acrobat Document: 27.8 KB, 4 seconds @ 56kbps
Judicial Review

Feb1309, CRA Notice of Enforcement
Adobe Acrobat Document: 1.00 MB, 2.5 minutes @ 56kbps
CRA Enforcement Order to Freeze Assets

Jul0809, OH CANADA
Adobe Acrobat Document: 59.4 KB, 9 seconds @ 56kbps
Letter to PM Harper

Wilfred v Canada and USA, Revised UN Complaint
Adobe Acrobat Document: 351 KB, 51 seconds @ 56kbps
Presented to the UN Human Rights Council on 12 June, 2007

Wilfred v USA, UN OHCHR Petition and Complaint
Adobe Acrobat Document: 590 KB, 86 seconds @ 56kbps
Presented to the UN Human Rights Council on 12 April 2007

Certicate of Loss of Nationality

NZ Deportation Order

Search

Case History Section 33