2001 - to Aug 2004
|
Continued Efforts from New Zealand
|
|
|
Section 30 speaks of Harmon and Carolyn's arrival in New Zealand in
August, 2001 and their continued efforts to cooperate with the family
court authorities in Colorado to the benefit of his children. After
some introductions to local business and political leaders and having
completed an assessment of the investment opportunities in New Zealand,
they decided to settle for a while in Christchurch, New Zealand. In
considering the legal and financial hardships they had endured while in
Canada through the attacks from Colorado and the US Justice System,
certain financial precautions were taken by Carolyn with regard to her
family estate. Harmon was required to sign a prenuptial agreement
concurrent with their marriage and Carolyn then employed Harmon to
manage her estate and investments in New Zealand and elsewhere. This
employment has been Harmon's sole personal income to date. Harmon's
compensation has been directly equivalent to his payments of child
support and maintenance plus basic personal expenses based upon a US
$50,000 annual salary. To date, Carolyn has made a number
of investments, all of which are vested in Carolyn's family trust.
Neither Carolyn nor Harmon own any of these investments personally and
Harmon is confined strictly to his income equivalent child support and
basic living expenses.
In early 2002, Harmon and Carolyn retained NZ attorney, John
Rutherford to make contact with the Colorado representatives of both
family court cases to begin re-negotiating payment structures and
attempt mediation and resolution as was possible. The attached PDF
E-mail record shows a sampling of the regular communication with
Dearna's attorney, Jeffrey Herren and Sandra's representative at the
Arapahoe County DA's office, child support services, Jenny Rutherford
(no relation). As indicated in the e-mails, nothing was accomplished in
mediation of the old structures of payment, however it was agreed as to
what Harmon's new salary could justify for child support and as such
certain minimum levels of new payments were established. In order to
get the new payment structure started on a good foundation, Carolyn
agreed to loan Harmon US$50,000 as a good faith payment to divide
equally between Dearna and Sandra and then begin to make quarterly
payments thereafter from his salary at rates above the minimum
requirements. Attached is a PDF schedule of the payments made since
April, 2002 to date totaling over US $200,000 The amount currently being
paid quarterly is US$10,500 or $42,000 per year. The original
collective amount ordered by the courts in both cases is an unrealistic,
unjustified and outrageous at US$10,500 PER MONTH. The child support
authorities in both counties have offered to reconsider the original
judgments based upon a true record of past and current income. After
over four years of consistent payments in late 2005, Harmon bagan
submissions to the respective counties to accomplish this goal. This
reconsideration is of course only for the current and further payment
levels. The only way given to deal with the accumulated arrearage is to
return to Colorado and challenge the original judgments in court.
Having returned two times previous to work with the system on all family
issues only to have the courts and the law enforcement systems violate
his rights even to the extent of knowingly and deliberately breaching
the International Hague Commission Treaty with further illegal charges
and arrest warrants, makes this a non option.
After some considerable cooperation through correspondence, including
e-mails, letters and notarized documents between Harmon's NZ attorney,
Al Manco, and the Child Support Enforcement Authority in Colorado, an
agreement and stipulation was reached as attached hereto in PDF,
Approved Child Support Reduction. The amazing conclusion was to reduce
what was thousands of dollars per month in support requirements, to a
mere $50 per month because of what the Colorado Support Authority stated
as a "refusal to cooperate" on the part of Harmon's ex-wife.
When Harmon's attorney returned the signed and notarized stipulation for
approval by the court, he was shocked to receive a return letter from
the Authority on October 31, 2005 stating their unwillingness to approve
the stipulation with the court or cooperate further... "based upon the
financial information you provided, and your US citizenship being
renounced...", please see attached PDF Child Services Notice. After
numerous attempts to phone the Authority for an explanation during which
they refused to take his calls, and e-mails with no response, Mr. Manco
wrote the attached PDF letter dated 14 November, 2005, Reply to Case
Manager Meghann Pence, outlining the lengthy process and approvals to
date (including their stipulated approval of Harmon's financial
information) and demanding an explanation. After forwarding this letter
by mail, e-mail and fax, to date there has been no reply or futher
cooperation from the Colorado Child Support Enforcement Authority.
In the process of Harmon's submission to the American Embassy in New
Zealand in 2004 to either renew or add pages to his passport that had no
room for further stamps (expired in December, 2005), the Embassy was
instructed to retain his passport until he payed all back accumulated
child support and spousal maintenance of over USD $1,000,000 (One
Million US Dollars). He is now making submissions to show the original
amounts of the judgments in both cases influenced by the political
corruption described throughout this web site as outrageous and
unfair. Of course he does not have now, nor never has had 1 million US
dollars. If he is forced to return to the US to challenge these
judgments, he will most certainly face recriminations from the CIA
and/or at the very least, be re-incarcerated by the El Paso County DA,
Jeanne Smith, stopping his gainful employment and child support
payments. At the same time, this latest action deliberately interferes
with Harmon's submission for a NZ Business Visa leading on to residency
so he can continue his employment. Catch 22? Lose no matter what, for
himself and his children? The US has given Harmon no other reasonable
choice but to file an appeal to remain in New Zealand upon the
expiration of his Visa in 2004 with the documentation within this web
site as his justified evidence. Imagine an American asking for
sanctuary just short of political asylum from in-humane treatment and
criminal political corruption in the US.
As shown in this web site, Harmon has gone to great lengths to report
the political corruption behind his family court judgments and related
criminal charges, and cooperate with the US system to prove his
innocence to no avail. He has gone all the way to the top to find no
possibility of a level playing field to hear his case. Therefore he has
come to the conclusion that the only level playing field left is the
World Wide Web Court of Public Justice. This is the field of legal
battle that he has now chosen, hoping that this challenge against those
who have attacked him can be justly played out before the media as his
judge and the World Wide Web / global public as his jury.
Lumina Diem and the World Wide Web Court of
Public Justice is now in session and we call upon all of those named in
the Summons and Complaints contained herein to step up and face Harmon
on this level playing field. May the truth prevail and the best man
win! In Harmon's own words, "My life is an open book and I have nothing
to hide. I have lived this nightmare for over 14 years and it's time
to finally insure my children's well being, get the truth on the table,
and get all of those individuals responsible for this criminal injustice
fired and in some cases, prosecuted! In the mean time Carolyn and I are
seeking residency and citizenship in New Zealand or elsewhere if turned
away".
Index of PDF Documents in Case History Section 30:
Pg 1-14 E-mail record of support efforts from New Zealand
Pg 1 Child Support record, April 2001 through September 2004
Pg 1 Child Support Services Notice of discontinuance of copperation
Pg 1-2 Reply to Colorado Child Support Services Case Manager Meghann Pence
Questions:
- With Harmon's whereabouts in New Zealand known by the US authorities
from the time of his initial arrival in late 2001, and assuming the
custody related criminal charges were not dismissed or sealed with the
federal sealing of the record of the Hague Commission violation, why
would he have not been pursued by the US authorities as in Canada
through extradition, if there were truly any substance to these
accusations?
- Is it possible that the US knows that New Zealand would never partner up with their corruption, unlike Canada?
- As a part of the filing of appeal to remain in New Zealand, and
with Harmon having no passport at this time to support the New Zealand
based international businesses, Harmon is also requesting residency and
citizenship in New Zealand. If New Zealand will not grant ultimate
residency and citizenship, are there other countries globally who will
accept Harmon and Carolyn as citizens personally along with the
placement of Carolyn's global based businesses and investments? Please
see www.harmonwilfred.com for their personal and business profiles.
- When Harmon's ex-wives refused to cooperate on a financial
update to determine child support, what purpose did it serve to simply
penalize them by reducing the amount to $50 per month? Did they refuse
because they were cheating on the system? Is this in the best interest
of the children?
- When Harmon was unable to show up for an ordered financial
examination to determine child support, an arrest order was issued to
force a Rule 69 Financial Examination under Court supervision. Are the
rules different for ex-wives?
- Why did the Colorado Child Support Enforcement Authority
complete an exhaustive process of obtaining all of Harmon's financial
information, offer him a stipulated settlement, and then refuse to
cooperate further? Is this in the best interest of the children?