Search

Adobe Acrobat Document Diplomatic Complaint, Reply/Rebut, Killing Fields!
Adobe Acrobat Document: 106 kB, 14 seconds seconds @ 56kbps

Adobe Acrobat Document Answer and Rebut, RE Complaint to CAN JD
Adobe Acrobat Document: 425 kB, 59 seconds seconds @ 56kbps

Adobe Acrobat Document Answer and Rebut, RE Complaint to CAN JD
Adobe Acrobat Document: 445 kB, 1.03 minutes @ 56kbps

Adobe Acrobat Document Answer and Rebut, Attachments
Adobe Acrobat Document: 445 kB, 1.03 minutes @ 56kbps

Adobe Acrobat Document Den Jail Record, no charge, no bond, May26, 00
Adobe Acrobat Document: 10.2 kB, 1 seconds seconds @ 56kbps

Case History Section 25

 

2000 - POST May 26

Multiple Violations of the International Hague Commission Treaty, Canada / US

  • Letter of Complaint to the Canadian Department of Justice by Alan Gold
  • Answer To Complaint, Canadian Department of Justice
  • Harmon's Rebuttal to Answer to Complaint by the Colorado DA and the Canadian Department of Justice
  • Illegal Re-Incarceration in The Denver City Jail ("The Killing Fields")

Section 25 provides a follow-up letter of complaint from Canadian attorney Alan Gold to the Canadian Department of Justice regarding a full account and chronology of events that took place following Harmon’s abandonment of his Canadian Extradition Appeal and his subsequent return to Colorado to deal with the extradition custody charges.  Mr. Gold objected to the repeated violations of the US / Canada (Hague Commission) Extradition Treaty on four occasions.  To add insult to injury, the Colorado and the Canadian Justice Department's response to the complaint was to dismiss the incident as having been taken care of by the ultimate dismissal of the federal complaint and charges.  Harmon's rebuttal with attachments appropriately point out that their response neglected to take into account the three further violations of the Treaty by the Federal Marshals and the Arapahoe County DA, not to mention the three weeks in Federal prison, four days in the Denver Jail "Killing Fields" or the more than US $50,000 legal costs of getting the complaint dismissed and gaining Harmon's release. This amount was generously loaned to Harmon through his Canadian wife, Carolyn's estate.  Of course if Harmon's wife would be willing to finance a civil case for the above violations, a mere US $50,000 or more toward suing them would do it?  The bottom line is, there is no way to win against legalized corruption as long as the corrupt run the system. No one is held accountable for their actions, even if you are willing to spend exorbitant amounts of money!

  1. The first Treaty violation was Harmon’s arrest by Federal Marshals for back child support while standing at the court entry in El Paso County, Colorado to appear in the extradition custody charge matters. 
  2. The second Treaty violation occurred after the dismissal of the Federal charges and sealing of the record by the Federal judge. Federal Marshals, with the Judges order to release and detain no further in their possession, defiantly deposited Harmon in the Denver city jail on a Thursday for the four day long weekend with a no charges and no bail instruction. A PDF copy of the computer printout jail record is attached in this section.
  3. The third Treaty violation was Harmon’s transfer on the following Tuesday to Arapahoe County Jail to face further incarceration (against the Treaty!) and a hearing that same day for a forced financial evaluation. This was deliberately done without Harmon’s counsel present. 
  4. When Harmon objected and explained the Federal order and Treaty violation, he was released on a $750,000 return order and bond which became the fourth Treaty violation.  Subsequently the return bond and order were also dismissed by the Arapahoe County Judge as a fourth violation of the International Treaty. 

Index of PDF Documents in Case History Section 25:

 

Pg       1          Letter from Alan Gold Canadian Justice Dept regarding multiple treaty violations

Pg       1-2      Response from the Canadian Department of Justice

Pg       3-6      Rebuttal to Colorado’s / and the CAN Justice Dept. response

Pg       7-13    Attachments to Rebuttal

Pg       1          Denver Jail (Killing Fields") Computer Record, No bond no charges

 

 

 

Questions:

 

 

  1. Alan Gold made it very clear in writing to the DA’s in, El Paso, and Arapahoe Counties before Harmon returned to Colorado, that any arrest or detention outside of the extradition charges would violate the International Treaty. As this Treaty is a federal agreement, how is it that the Federal Prosecutor would be waiting for Harmon with a sequestered arrest order upon his arrival at the El Paso County Court scheduled hearing, in direct contravention to the Treaty and then when ordered by a federal judge to drop these charges and release him immediately, re-incarcerated him in the Denver City Jail (the ‘Killing Fields’) for no charges and no bail?
  2. Why did the Federal Marshals prevent Harmon from attending his El Paso County Court hearing involving the extradition child custody charges?  To this day he still has not been able to defend those charges due to the constant diversions created with other illegal charges every time he has attempted to return under the original extradition order of the El Paso County Court.
  3. When it was made clear in the first Federal Court hearing by Harmon’s Counsel on May 11, 2000, that by detaining and arresting him the US authorities were in violation of the US / Canada Treaty,  why did the Federal Judge choose to ignore the Treaty and retain Harmon for three weeks on a $150,000 bond?
  4. When the first illegal Federal charges were finally dismissed because they contravened the Treaty and the file was sealed by the court, how could the Federal Marshals, while holding the court order for release in their hands and with full knowledge they were violating the Treaty, believe they could get away with immediately re-arresting Harmon and incarcerating him in the Denver Jail ‘Killing Fields’ for four days on the basis of no charges and no bond.
  5. Who was responsible for all these arrests when there was full knowledge that they were blatantly in violation of the Treaty? More influence by DA’s Suthers and Smith at the Federal Level?  Was President Clinton involved?
  6. How could the Chief of Staff of the USJD, Michael Horowitz and the Public Integrity Section find that there was no criminal wrong doing after examining the full Case History package, and the first and second supplement with attachments involving more that 500 pages of evidence, without so much as an investigation?
  7. Seeing the thread of consistent documented illegal involvement by John Suthers at every level of this case, how could George W. Bush appoint him as Federal Attorney for the State of Colorado?  Did the FBI and the Office of Congressional Affairs really look into Suthers' background as required before the appointment?