1990 - June 4 - Nov 8, 1990
|
Suits Filed for Civil Rights Violations / Bankruptcy
|
|
- Wilfred VS Wilfred et al, Civil Rights, June 4, 1990
- Wilfred VS 18th Judicial District, Judge Steinhardt, October 25, 1990
- Court Docket Case Record, Civil Rights Case
- Wilfred Bankruptcy, Court Docket
|
Section 3 provides a full copy of
the Complaint filed in regard to the civil rights violations committed
against Harmon Wilfred during the Sandra Wilfred divorce proceeding from
1989 through 1990 presided over by the 18th Judicial District Court of
Colorado and Judge Joyce Steinhardt, the head judge for the district and
the presiding judge in these family court matters. The complete
Transcript Section window at the top left of this page next to the Case
History window covers the entirety of the divorce proceedings referenced
in this complaint. You will find the content of these transcripts a
drama that you cannot put down and will never forget. Lawyers who have
reviewed the transcripts have been quoted as saying that civil and
constitutional rights violations could not happened in any court room in
the USA .... and yet they acknowledge.... it did. Also contained
within this page are PDF copies of the record of filings for the
original civil rights case filed in June 1990, the October
1990, complaint filing and Harmon's bankruptcy case with Jeffrey Hill,
the federal bankruptcy attorney.
Index of PDF Documents in Case History Section 3:
Pg 1 Wilfred v 18th Judicial District, Civil Rights, June 4, 1990, Court Docket
Pg 1-2 Outline of Constitutional Rights Violations in Complaint
Pg 3-41 The Complaint, Civil Action no. 90-1892, Wilfred v !8th Judicial District
Pg 1-4 Wilfred v 18th Judicial District, Case Dismissal, Nov 08,1990
Pg 1-2 Wilfred v 18th Judicial District, Oct 25, 90, Court Docket
Pg 1 Bankruptcy Case Docket, 90-01505, re Wilfred Case- 89-8827
Additional PDF’s are one page each and are self explanatory in their titles.
Questions:
- How is it possible that the Constitution of the United States of America can be ignored / overruled in the family court without a federal remedy when rights are violated?
- How
is it possible that Judge Steinhardt could incarcerate Harmon for
refusing to represent himself, then give permission for an illegal
search of his home without a search warrant and without police
attendance?
- How
is it possible Judge Steinhardt could permit Harmon's home, files and
even his safe to be broken into and destroyed by an opposing attorney
during a trial, and also give permission for attorney client privilege
documentation obtained in this illegal search to be submitted into
evidence?
- How
is it possible that Judge Steinhardt can submit her own personal
psychological evaluation, “from a layman’s point of view”, without any
professional testimony, pronouncing him "dangerous to himself and the
public at large" and thereby eliminate his parental rights on that basis
alone? Especially when the Judge did indeed have Harmon evaluated by a
psychologist and a psychiatrist while he was incarcerated who found him
normal, and she simply neglected to submit this information into
evidence?
- How
can a Federal Judge make a decision to dismiss a case for civil rights
violations committed by Judge Steinhardt in a court room setting without
ever seeing the evidence in the transcripts? In fact, the court
transcripts were deliberately kept from Harmon by Judge Steinhardt until
his federal civil rights case against her was dismissed.